Skip to content

Enclosure Design

Design specifications and constraints for the Dilder 3D-printed case.


Form Factor

Style: Landscape rectangle — "iPod Nano" layout with display dominating the left face and a compact button cluster on the right.

Concept renders:

v1 — Initial rough layout

Prototype v1 concept render

v2 — Dimension-accurate revision (current reference)

Prototype v2 concept render


v2 Dimensions

Metric Value
Case outer dimensions 88 × 34 × 19mm
Display window cutout 57 × 27mm
Active pixel area 48.55 × 23.71mm (250×122 px)
Button cluster width ~22mm
Button center-to-center ~10mm
Display face coverage 51%
Button face coverage 12%
Display-to-button ratio 4.3 : 1
Estimated weight ~45g bare / ~65g with battery
Size reference Slightly wider than a credit card, ~2/3 the height

Component Dimensions

Sourced from official datasheets and measured hardware.

Component Dimension Source
Pi Zero board 65 × 30 × 5mm Official Raspberry Pi spec
Waveshare HAT board 65 × 30.2mm Waveshare specification
Display glass outline 59.2 × 29.2 × 1.05mm V3/V4 specification PDF
Display active area 48.55 × 23.71mm V3/V4 specification PDF
Dot pitch 0.194 × 0.194mm V3/V4 specification PDF
Pi + HAT stack height ~15mm (with header) Measured
6×6mm tactile button 6 × 6 × 4.3–9.5mm Standard spec

Design Constraints

These constraints must be satisfied by any enclosure design:

  1. Display cutout: 57 × 27mm with 1mm case lip overlap around display glass
  2. Button holes: 5× circular apertures, ~7mm diameter, d-pad cross pattern with ~10mm center-to-center
  3. USB access: Micro-USB slot on bottom edge (power and data during development)
  4. SD card access: Slot on left edge (SD card can be removed without disassembly)
  5. Assembly: 2-piece shell (top + bottom), 4× M2 corner screws
  6. Shell seam: Horizontal split at case midpoint (~9.5mm from each face)
  7. Battery bay: Reserved space on right side behind button PCB — 30 × 19mm footprint (Phase 6)
  8. Ventilation: 5× slot vents on back panel

Material Options

Material Pros Cons
PLA Easy to print, good detail, cheap Brittle, warps in heat
PETG Tougher than PLA, better heat resistance Slightly harder to print, less detail
ABS Good mechanical properties Warps badly without enclosure, fumes
ASA Weather resistant, UV stable Expensive, similar print difficulty to ABS

Recommendation for prototype: PLA. Fast to iterate, lowest barrier to getting prints done. Switch to PETG or ASA for a final build.


Future Revisions

  • v3: Incorporate real component fits once hardware is in hand — verify Pi + HAT stack height, button stem height clearance
  • v4: Add lanyard loop, redesign battery bay for specific battery model
  • Final: Remove breadboard references, finalize internal PCB mount points